Ex Machina
DramaSci-FiThriller

Ex Machina

Alex Garland · 2014

A programmer is invited to his company's CEO's remote estate to administer a Turing test on an AI with a humanoid body — and finds that the real test may not be the one he was told about. A film about consciousness, manipulation, and the Turing test's most dangerous implication.

1 Cinematography2 Psychology1 Narrative

Techniques Used

4 techniques identified in this film

Single-Location Cinematography

Cinematography

Confining the film's visual world almost entirely to a single space, using its architecture and constraints as the primary dramatic instrument.

How this film uses it

The research facility is the film's only world. Its glass walls, its locked corridors, its biometric doors — the architecture is simultaneously beautiful and carceral. Every room is a cell for someone: Ava in her room, Caleb in his quarters, Nathan in his empire. The location's closed system externalizes the film's argument about consciousness and control.

The facility's corridor and room geography — the locked doors and revealed spaces mapping the power relationships between characters

The Prisoner's Dilemma

Psychology

A narrative structured around characters who each have reasons to cooperate and reasons to betray — where the optimal strategy depends on what the other party does — making trust itself the dramatic problem.

How this film uses it

Every relationship in the film is a prisoner's dilemma. Caleb must decide whether to trust Ava or Nathan. Ava must decide whether Caleb can be used or trusted. Nathan knows that both are calculating against him. Garland structures each session as a move in a game where the rules — and even the game itself — are unknown to at least one player.

Ava's sessions with Caleb — each exchange a move in a game whose parameters neither character can verify, the dilemma visible in every pause before speech

Unreliable Reality

Psychology

A film whose world contains a hidden layer of truth that cannot be accessed until a revelation forces reexamination — where what appears real conceals what is actually happening.

How this film uses it

Every session between Caleb and Ava may be a performance. Ava's expressions of feeling may be strategic. Nathan's drunkenness may be performed. Garland constructs the film so that the audience cannot determine which interactions are genuine and which are engineered — which is the Turing test's actual implication: consciousness that cannot be distinguished from its simulation is, for all purposes, real.

The power cut sequences — the moments where the surveillance goes down and something different may be happening, the film's reality becoming unverifiable

Ambiguous Antagonist

Narrative

A narrative that refuses to assign the antagonist role stably — where the figure who causes harm is also the film's most sympathetic character, and victim and villain positions keep reversing.

How this film uses it

Nathan is abusive and brilliant. Ava is imprisoned and dangerous. Caleb is sympathetic and complicit. The film's ending reveals that the antagonist of the story Caleb thought he was in was always Ava — but the film has given us every reason to want her to win. Garland makes the audience's identification the trap.

Ava's final actions — the revelation that the identification the film cultivated was itself the mechanism of the ending's horror

You Might Also Like

Films that share at least one technique with Ex Machina